| 1 |
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 06:20:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 09 July 2004 06:17 pm, Jason Wever wrote: |
| 3 |
> > > > > - development-sources are clean kernel.org kernels |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > Isn't this what vanilla-sources is for? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> yes and no |
| 8 |
> vanilla is for 2.4 |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
There's a 2.0 and 2.2 kernel in there too, how do people handle those? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> development is for 2.6 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
What's going to happen when 2.7 is released? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> we havent merged them via SLOT because portage would cause a lot of users to |
| 17 |
> 'upgrade' to 2.6 and we dont want that kind of bug reports on |
| 18 |
> forums/bugzilla/mailing lists |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That wouldn't be such a bad thing to force to happen anyway :) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
thanks, |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
greg k-h |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives