| 1 |
Vlastimil Babka wrote: |
| 2 |
> Raúl Porcel wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Agreed from mozilla. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> firefox and seamonkey already have the global use-flag |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Is there any guideline from mozilla team about what to do when there are |
| 8 |
> more than one of these flags (firefox/seamonkey/xulrunner) supported by |
| 9 |
> package AND enabled by user? Some of those local flag descriptions |
| 10 |
> suggest that USE="firefox xulrunner" results in using xulrunner (so it |
| 11 |
> has higher priority). So is that recommended, and how about seamonkey? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Sorry, didn't saw this msg. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I don't know of any guideline. Anyway all apps should start to use |
| 17 |
xulrunner, since that's what they really want instead of using firefox |
| 18 |
or seamonkey. When ff-3.0 is released no app will be able to build |
| 19 |
against ff, since ff will build against xulrunner. So, what i said, apps |
| 20 |
should use xulrunner as primary option, now that xulrunner is up-to-date |
| 21 |
and working fine. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives