| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 09/23/2012 12:40 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:02:01 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> On 09/23/2012 11:56 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 11 |
>>>> So i would prefer some help/support with multilib-portage to |
| 12 |
>>>> get it accepted sooner, instead of this additional workaround |
| 13 |
>>>> for a subset of packages. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> I prefer the simpler solution. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> I prefer the stronger solution. This is just a quick workaround. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> How is it stronger? By doing implicit magic on every ebuild? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
a) does not involve modifying ebuilds |
| 24 |
b) works in a larger scale |
| 25 |
c) is tested and developed for quite some time |
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 28 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQXvsmAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzZAcH/11b4Wng7f+nyDpbFQhanpLW |
| 31 |
56mQy4IGmEvmEqgrYyBPLtnXWh+BtNu+j0ogS8hNMxsVXvDw6HvJGbeXwebcQ6VY |
| 32 |
OQS5l0IZvK9Zz+H4wm+ACv1i6fWPG9nRuMg8phRwfnq0jMIIF2lP1nll5T/2QYU/ |
| 33 |
fvPxiweKca9id4hozc0C0319vpVjEoX9a8/dBh6JXGNlzPq54bf7+6qep8O7mWGo |
| 34 |
9bKXkoobwd22wUnBajcOFg4mbMu7cnKsTn0PhQBXo2+tEV5MhgugGe8USq99u8xA |
| 35 |
CQVVRcdbjyQZW90W8c0/Dniq8LMcTY6xoKmH5a2vG0dpHahYtKtCZ2sTruxgppc= |
| 36 |
=KNcl |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives