| 1 |
On Fri, 2002-06-14 at 20:52, Doug Goldstein wrote: |
| 2 |
> Works perfectly fine the doc way and I think you wanted the splashimage to be |
| 3 |
> without the /boot but you didn't type that. However I like it the doc way |
| 4 |
> with /boot in there. Makes it a bit more clear to look at. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
indeed, the docs way is clearer imho, and if you look closely, there is |
| 7 |
a symlink in /boot pointing back to /boot (/boot/boot-> /boot) it's a |
| 8 |
hack, but it's a clean one, and one that makes a lot of sense.(other |
| 9 |
wise many people could easily get confused. |
| 10 |
> -Doug |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> On Friday 14 June 2002 03:21 pm, Hanford_Smith, Jason wrote: |
| 13 |
> > Code Listing 40 |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > The following two lines have errors: |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > should be |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > splashimage=(hd0,0)/boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > and |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> > kernel /boot/bzImage root=/dev/hda3 |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> > should be |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > kernel /bzImage root=/dev/hda3 |
| 31 |
> > |
| 32 |
> > |
| 33 |
> > Reason: Both file references are relative to (hd0,0) which is already /boot |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > |
| 36 |
> > --Jason |
| 37 |
> > _______________________________________________ |
| 38 |
> > gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 39 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 40 |
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 41 |
> |
| 42 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 43 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 44 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 45 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
| 46 |
> |
Archives