| 1 |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:54:31 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:18:00 +0200 |
| 6 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > > The former two were previously provided by 'extras' USE flag, |
| 9 |
> > > and the third was unconditional. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > since udev-171 seems to be going stable, why not simply drop the |
| 12 |
> > 'extras' compatibility ? |
| 13 |
> > then you could just use 'gudev?' usedeps it seems |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I heard that people are still bound to old udev versions because of |
| 16 |
> kernel requirements introduced by newer ones. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
The eventual plan is to kill off the extras use flag in favor of the |
| 19 |
others. It is only there to allow packages that depended on udev[extras] |
| 20 |
to be moved to depend on the correct use flag, so I think we should be |
| 21 |
able to kill it at some point. I just haven't looked into doing that. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
William |
Archives