Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 05:55:59
Message-Id: 20170524055534.GA17263@waltdnes.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list by "Michał Górny"
1 Let's step back a minute, and consider *WHY* non-developers feel the
2 need to join this list in the first place. Do you remember the acrimony
3 after the decision to not officially support a separate /usr without
4 initramfs? A lot of people who complained on the Gentoo-User list were
5 bluntly told that the devs hadn't heard much objection, and that they
6 should've expressed their opinion on *THIS* list *BEFORE* the final
7 decision was made. This reminds me of a quote from The Hitchiker's Guide
8 To The Galaxy...
9
10
11 "But the plans were on display..."
12
13 "On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them."
14
15 "That's the display department."
16
17 "With a flashlight."
18
19 "Ah, well, the lights had probably gone."
20
21 "So had the stairs."
22
23 "But look, you found the notice, didn't you?"
24
25 "Yes," said Arthur, "yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a
26 locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the
27 door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'."
28
29
30 I'd really rather not have to follow an additional list which includes
31 a lot of very technical items and patches that are over my head. But
32 after the separate /usr fiasco, I don't feel I have any choice. If we
33 could have a guarantee of proposed changes like that being posted on
34 Gentoo-User for comment, rather than being sprung on users by surprise,
35 I'd be willing to sign off this list.
36
37 --
38 Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>
39 I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>