1 |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:07:01 +0200 |
2 |
Thomas Sachau <tommy@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Do you prefer having everything hardcoded in PMS or can you accept |
4 |
> outsourcing bigger code pieces into some sort of eclass (i am thinking |
5 |
> about some external code base, which can be duplicated by the package |
6 |
> manager with internal code, but has to be used, if the external eclass |
7 |
> has a newer version/revision then the duplicated internal code)? |
8 |
|
9 |
The package manager mustn't require any particular eclass to be |
10 |
present, and there mustn't be duplication between eclasses and the |
11 |
package manager. |
12 |
|
13 |
> I am especially thinking about the setup of the environment and the |
14 |
> code details for the wrappers for binaries and headers, hardcoding |
15 |
> those details into PMS makes it hard to change/fix issues later on. |
16 |
|
17 |
Sounds like you haven't really got a clean design then. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |