Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mark Loeser <halcy0n@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 19:48:58
Message-Id: 20110516194820.GC11997@halcy0n.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild by Alec Warner
1 Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> said:
2 > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote:
4 > >> El 16/05/11 19:54, Kacper Kowalik escribió:
5 > >> > Neither of those points include sending mail to gentoo-dev, which tend
6 > >> > to quickly convert into the "witch hunt" and seldom lead to anything
7 > >> > conclusive.
8 > >> To some of us (i.e. me as a staffer and probably any wanna be developer
9 > >> following the list) it is a good way to learn from others' mistake
10 > >> before applying for full developership.
11 > >>
12 > >
13 > > This may be a bit of surprise to you but this is not an educational
14 > > list. If you people disagree with these kind of commits feel free to
15 > > open a bug to QA/Devrel like the policy suggests. But pretty please
16 > > try to break this non-sense loop of this and similar threads.
17 >
18 > I actually value times when this stuff is CC'd to the list, is there
19 > some other list you think folks should CC problems on?
20
21 This is exactly where these sorts of emails should go so every other
22 developer can see what's going on and ensure they are also following
23 current policies.
24
25 Don't make yet another list...that's just pointless.
26
27 --
28 Mark Loeser
29 email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org
30 email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com
31 web - http://www.halcy0n.com

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature