1 |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:48:53AM +0700, grozin@g.o wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2014, William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > 1. I think maintainers should be able to stabilize their packages on arch's |
4 |
> > they have access to. I think this is allowed by some arch teams, but I |
5 |
> > think it would be good to formalize it. |
6 |
> +1 |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Also, there is a substantial number of packages which contain only python |
9 |
> code (or perl, ruby), or only LaTeX classes, or only documentation. It |
10 |
> makes no sense to test them on each arch separately. I think maintainers |
11 |
> should be allowed to stabilize such packages (with no compiled code) on |
12 |
> all arches. |
13 |
|
14 |
There is a reason we don't do this, back in Gentoo history somewhere, but I |
15 |
don't remember what it was. |
16 |
|
17 |
If someone can tell us why this isn't allowed I am all ears. Otherwise, |
18 |
I could agree on this point as well. |
19 |
|
20 |
William |