1 |
I was just looking at some random ebuilds recently, and noticed this |
2 |
snippet in gcc-4.5* ebuilds: |
3 |
|
4 |
SSP_STABLE="amd64 x86 ppc ppc64 arm |
5 |
# uclibc need tls and nptl support for SSP support" |
6 |
SSP_UCLIBC_STABLE="" |
7 |
|
8 |
Please note how the #-starting comment is inside the SSP_STABLE variable |
9 |
declaration. It looks very obvious when seen in a syntax-coloring editor. |
10 |
|
11 |
I'm not sure if it breaks, as "uclibc", "need", "tls" etc. are not valid |
12 |
arch names, but it's still probably not intended. |