From: | William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] rfc: location of portage tree |
Date: | Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:07:22 |
Message-Id: | 20120327190554.GA6866@linux1 |
1 | All, |
2 | |
3 | I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the |
4 | specific objections were. |
5 | |
6 | IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all. |
7 | I was chatting with another developer who uses |
8 | /var/cache/portage/{tree,distfiles}, and I'm thinking about switching my |
9 | default setup to do this. |
10 | |
11 | I realize that historically the portage tree has been installed under |
12 | /usr, but Can we consider changing this default for new installations |
13 | and providing instructions for users for how to get the portage tree out |
14 | of /usr? |
15 | William |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: location of portage tree | "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: location of portage tree | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: location of portage tree | Kent Fredric <kentfredric@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: location of portage tree | Alex Alexander <wired@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: location of portage tree | "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> |