Re: [gentoo-dev] musl, sbcl, and ros

[Andrey Grozin]

On Fri, 2 Dec 2022, Sam James wrote:
> If the dependencies are optional (at least for some), we should indeed (package.)use.mask sbcl on musl to reduce the damage,
> then package.mask the remaining unconditional reverse dependencies.
But I cannot do these this myself. I use neither musl nor ros. I suppose 
ros developers should update their ebuilds to conditionalize as many uses 
of sbcl as possible. It would be good to call this USE flag "sbcl". 2 
packages (sci-mathematics/maxima and sci-mathematics/fricas) already use 
this name, and I have included it in profiles/features/musl/use.mask.

Thanks,
Andrey