| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Christian Faulhammer wrote: |
| 5 |
> Petteri R�ty <betelgeuse@g.o>: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>> I did see anything in devmanual taking a stance on this issue: |
| 8 |
>> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/variables/index.html |
| 9 |
>> What do you think about adding a sentence or two saying that you |
| 10 |
>> should not use version numbers in DESCRIPTION? This could even be |
| 11 |
>> added to repoman. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Is this iussue that grave, that we repoman needs to whine about it? |
| 14 |
> What is the issue with it (apart from p.g.o, eix and friends not |
| 15 |
> displaying correct information) exactly? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> V-Li |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Perhaps we should just move DESCRIPTIONs to metadata. That would make it |
| 20 |
impossible to use ${PV} and more importantly also remove some duplication. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Marijn |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.5 (GNU/Linux) |
| 27 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iD8DBQFGpeY0p/VmCx0OL2wRAttEAJ4pNQ9Ez7zz3wyOsZtBKclfEIll0gCfTW6z |
| 30 |
w1X0FcpUJ1OnijVdd8wOJ0A= |
| 31 |
=JsjC |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives