Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response; update 2015/11/11, potential impact to 30min rsync cycle
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:52:55
Message-Id: 20151112115243.74473ade@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog - Infra Response; update 2015/11/11, potential impact to 30min rsync cycle by Jason Zaman
1 On Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:49:38 +0800
2 Jason Zaman <perfinion@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:46:19AM +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
5 > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2015 23:11:48 +0000
6 > > "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
7 > >
8 > > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 12:54:06PM +0100, Alexis Ballier wrote:
9 > > > > It's not perfectly clean but I don't see any problem here:
10 > > > > ChangeLog-2015 : all ChangeLog from CVS
11 > > > > ChangeLog: autogenerated from git
12 > > > FYI, this was implemented.
13 > >
14 > >
15 > > Thanks!
16 > >
17 > > How should one report bugs ? to infra or portage ?
18 > > From my just rsynced tree, I see changelogs in reverse order: oldest
19 > > come first, latest come last
20 >
21 > NOTABUG, it was changed because rsync can deal really well with
22 > appending to the end of files. rsyncing a file where things were
23 > things were added to the beginning of the file means rsync will copy
24 > the whole file from scratch which is pretty sub-optimal.
25
26
27 k, rsync limitation then :)