| 1 |
On 09/10/13 20:20, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
> El vie, 04-10-2013 a las 10:23 +0200, Bernard Cafarelli escribió: |
| 3 |
>> I just removed myself from this herd (not enough time and I have not |
| 4 |
>> used Afterstep for a long long time), feel free to join if you are an |
| 5 |
>> Afterstep user! |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Open bugs currently include fixing some ignored LDFLAGS, a compilation |
| 8 |
>> failure in libafterimage, and a version bump for afterstep itself |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Will proceed to move its packages to maintainer-needed in a week if it |
| 12 |
> keeps being empty then |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Move the x11-wm/afterstep package to desktop-wm@ and x11-plugins/ ones |
| 15 |
to desktop-dock@ |
| 16 |
Ditto for net-mail/asmail which is a dock, so desktop-dock@ |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Only package from afterstep herd that should/could go to m-needed@ is |
| 20 |
the libafterimage package itself. |
| 21 |
But because only package using it in Portage is sci-physics/root, you |
| 22 |
might consider asking it's maintainer, bircoph |
Archives