| 1 |
* Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 07.09.15 um 15:07 Uhr: |
| 2 |
> >>>>> On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull |
| 7 |
> > when you have a dependency on another package but a single version |
| 8 |
> > of it is not compatible for example. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> This doesn't look like a feature that would be needed very often. |
| 11 |
> Since "<>cat/foo-1" is equivalent to "|| ( >cat/foo-1 <cat-foo-1 )" |
| 12 |
> I wonder if it's worth the effort. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Valid point. I am unsure. If it it would make the resolver noticable |
| 15 |
slower, I'd say now. Otherwise propably yes. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> > [...] |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> > What do you think and would is the proper way to suggest this for a |
| 21 |
> > new EAPI? A new bug? On what? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> It should be filed as a bug (assigned to "Gentoo Hosted Projects" / |
| 24 |
> "PMS/EAPI"). |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Thanks. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Your proposal looks like a special case of bug 4315, though. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Which is solved using || ( >foo <foo ) I guess … |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-Marc |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 |
| 38 |
3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 |
Archives