Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] uninstalling packages with portage
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 07:27:38
Message-Id: 20030827072735.GA30815@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] uninstalling packages with portage by Thomas de Grenier de Latour
1 On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:11:24AM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
2 [snip]
3 >
4 > Good news, there is big issue on my list:
5 >
6 > - openmotif vs. lesstif: a well known one. Almost all files are in both
7 > packages. I would vote for a mutual exclusion, because it doesn't
8 > makes sense to have both installed (one breaks the other). And in case
9 > of updates, the user will sometimes get lesstif, sometimes openmotif...
10 > (and don't ask why both where installed on my system, I have no idea)
11
12 Er, they already block each other and dependencies should be on
13 virtual/motif...
14
15 > - sys-apps/coreutils-5.0-r2 vs. sys-apps/shadow-4.0.3-r7 on /bin/groups
16 > (is it supposed to be the same program in both
17 > packages?)
18 >
19 > - dev-tcltk/expect-5.37.1-r1 vs. net-misc/whois-4.6.6-r2 on
20 > /usr/bin/mkpasswd (same question)
21 >
22
23 Both of these are probably just about the same; functionally speaking,
24 they're extremely basic applications.
25
26 > - app-admin/etcat-0.1 vs. app-portage/gentoolkit-0.1.30: couldn't the
27 > separate package (etcat) be removed?
28 >
29
30 Already is.--
31 Jon Portnoy
32 avenj/irc.freenode.net
33
34 --
35 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] uninstalling packages with portage Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr>