1 |
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@××××××××.uk> wrote: |
2 |
> You could try to argue that many eyes will look at a central piece of |
3 |
> code but in fact less implementations will likely mean less eyes and |
4 |
> just assumption that a guy who got JS through as a config language has |
5 |
> everything covered. |
6 |
|
7 |
Still can't wrap my mind around that. A call into a multi-MB generic |
8 |
language library (usually with JIT as well) on every PolKit action — |
9 |
right, a good idea. I kind of liked PolKit before that change. |
10 |
|
11 |
This is a major problem, there are other questionable choices that |
12 |
raise the question whether developers are familiar with how things are |
13 |
done on Unix: |
14 |
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58787 |
15 |
|
16 |
> Sudo even supports regex! |
17 |
|
18 |
Only glob patterns, and it's not too good at that. |
19 |
http://www.sudo.ws/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=500 |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Maxim Kammerer |
23 |
Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte |