Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing?
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 08:22:24
Message-Id: 201304141023.05880.dilfridge@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing? by Ryan Hill
1 Am Sonntag, 14. April 2013, 10:24:18 schrieb Ryan Hill:
2 >
3 > Personally I think that the entire idea of only displaying messages on the
4 > first install is completely asinine. What exactly is the benefit? Were
5 > users complaining that we were being too helpful and they'd like us to
6 > hide important messages in random places?
7
8 No. They are just not reading it when the only new and relevant message is
9 drowned in repetitive spam.
10
11 --
12
13 Andreas K. Huettel
14 Gentoo Linux developer
15 dilfridge@g.o
16 http://www.akhuettel.de/

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies