From: | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing? | ||
Date: | Sun, 14 Apr 2013 08:22:24 | ||
Message-Id: | 201304141023.05880.dilfridge@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing? by Ryan Hill |
1 | Am Sonntag, 14. April 2013, 10:24:18 schrieb Ryan Hill: |
2 | > |
3 | > Personally I think that the entire idea of only displaying messages on the |
4 | > first install is completely asinine. What exactly is the benefit? Were |
5 | > users complaining that we were being too helpful and they'd like us to |
6 | > hide important messages in random places? |
7 | |
8 | No. They are just not reading it when the only new and relevant message is |
9 | drowned in repetitive spam. |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | |
13 | Andreas K. Huettel |
14 | Gentoo Linux developer |
15 | dilfridge@g.o |
16 | http://www.akhuettel.de/ |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing? | Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> |