Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o>
To: Gentoo Developers <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Use of "nomirror" flag
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:13:42
Message-Id: 20041025211337.GP26288@mail.lieber.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Use of "nomirror" flag by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:37:27PM -0700 or thereabouts, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
2 > On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 11:21:18AM -0500, Corey Shields wrote:
3 > > Keep in mind that anytime you set this flag on a package, people who
4 > > rely on a distfile mirror as their only source of Gentoo packages will
5 > > not get the package. This is common in many cases where Gentoo is being
6 > > used inside a private network that utilizes a local distfile mirror on
7 > > the inside of that network.
8 > This is incorrect. They should be using a 'local' entry in
9 > /etc/portage/mirrors in such a configuration, as it does get checked
10 > even when RESTRICT="nomirror" is in place.
11
12 Are you saying that putting "local" in /etc/portage/mirrors overrides the
13 'nomirror' flag? If so, great (though that opens up some other
14 concerns...). If not, then Corey's original point still stands. Use of
15 nomirror prevents people from establishing their own local mirrors of
16 files.
17
18 --kurt

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Use of "nomirror" flag "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>