Archives
Archives
| From: | Sam James <sam@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] PSA: switching default tmpfiles virtual provider | ||
| Date: | Thu, 26 Nov 2020 22:42:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | D7D9223A-BEBB-4671-AB51-22B5428D84BD@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] PSA: switching default tmpfiles virtual provider by Peter Stuge |
||
| 1 | > On 26 Nov 2020, at 22:37, Peter Stuge <peter@×××××.se> wrote: |
| 2 | > Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 3 | >> Corollary: the tmpfiles.d specification can only be implemented (safely) |
| 4 | >> on Linux after all. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | > So should virtual/tmpfiles differentiate based on system? |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | It won’t be keyworded where it’s not available so Portage will skip over it. systemd only supports certain platforms. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | > //Peter |
| 13 | > |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |