1 |
On 2021-01-08 17:03, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
2 |
> I strongly object to you pushing this patch as-is. There have been |
3 |
> plenty of non-technical objections, including from the eclass |
4 |
> maintainer. |
5 |
|
6 |
The eclass maintainer has disqualified himself going into a technical |
7 |
debate with saying |
8 |
|
9 |
> So, over my dead commit access. |
10 |
|
11 |
in his first posting. |
12 |
|
13 |
|
14 |
This is a technical mailing list. Currently, acct-* stuff is breaking |
15 |
stuff. Nobody has challenged this yet. |
16 |
|
17 |
Now I proposed a way how to unbreak stuff. |
18 |
|
19 |
Please tell me why we should keep broken stuff for non-technical reason |
20 |
and cause harm for those who are affected? |
21 |
|
22 |
It's not like we cannot address the other stuff later. It's about |
23 |
getting the fix down to users who are currently affected by this. So why |
24 |
take hostage when some user(s) ignore the problem for more than a year |
25 |
and show that they are not interested in collaboration to find a |
26 |
solution for a technical problem they created despite warnings before |
27 |
this went live? |
28 |
|
29 |
Of course, if you are not affected by this problem it is very easy to |
30 |
relax and sit back. You have all the time in the world... but when you |
31 |
are affected by this at large scale it is not that funny anymore. |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Regards, |
36 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
37 |
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |