1 |
Ioannis Aslanidis wrote: |
2 |
> On 4/19/07, Steve Long wrote: |
3 |
>> On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES="collision-detect" by |
4 |
>> default would do a lot more good at this stage than "test". There are |
5 |
>> several packages I have come across where this has picked up files not |
6 |
>> being removed from earlier versions. It's a reasonable default to have |
7 |
>> and doesn't involve delaying users since it takes a fraction of a second |
8 |
>> to carry out. What I'd propose is that portage runs the collision-detect |
9 |
>> and reports it, but continues the installation in the same manner as now. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> This could tie into an automated report at a later stage. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Do you mean to report a 'QA notice' instead of halting the merge? |
14 |
> Well, actually halting the merge is a required feature, so maybe the |
15 |
> QA notice should be added always straightway, not bound to the |
16 |
> FEATURE. |
17 |
> |
18 |
Yes, that's what I meant, sorry for being unclear. The collision-detect |
19 |
should run by default, and report a QA error, only halting if the FEATURE |
20 |
is set. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |