Archives
Archives
| From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: please use the latest Portage/repoman version to commit to tree | ||
| Date: | Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:09:52 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1285834179.8784.1.camel@localhost.localdomain | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: please use the latest Portage/repoman version to commit to tree by Dirkjan Ochtman |
||
| 1 | El jue, 30-09-2010 a las 09:41 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman escribió: |
| 2 | > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 09:36, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > > What is the general opinion on this? |
| 4 | > > Do you (developers) all use ~arch portage? |
| 5 | > > How big is the risk? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > As another dev who generally runs stable (except things that I hack |
| 8 | > on), another question: is it actually possible, as Diego seems to |
| 9 | > suggest, to have two portages installed? |
| 10 | > |
| 11 | > Cheers, |
| 12 | > |
| 13 | > Dirkjan |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | |
| 16 | And I would also ask, Where a portage-2.1.9 version will be stabilized? |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Thanks a lot for the info :-) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: please use the latest Portage/repoman version to commit to tree | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: please use the latest Portage/repoman version to commit to tree | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |