| 1 |
On 12/02/13 08:21, Ian Whyman wrote: |
| 2 |
> Guys, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Can we not just have a developer wide vote or something? This |
| 5 |
> instance clearly not going to resole itself. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
It is a little bikeshed. Originally the virtual was ordered in a |
| 8 |
way, then ordered in another and now we are discussing which one is |
| 9 |
better for the user after we turned it around again. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
There isn't ANYTHING that is impacting users beside those that they |
| 12 |
might get the next versions of gst-libav just end up with a runtime |
| 13 |
error if they use ffmpeg (if the upstream authors follow up with their |
| 14 |
plan) or those users wanting to use mencoder might get some compile |
| 15 |
errors if I forgot to update the compatibility patch after somebody |
| 16 |
bumped w/out testing. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
It really boils down to decide to be extra careful with mplayer and xbmc |
| 19 |
or being extra careful with gst-libav and maybe vlc. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Sadly this whole discussion turned to discussing who is right or wrong, |
| 24 |
who is the fork or not and who's an evil bastard oppressing the poor |
| 25 |
Austrian genius or not. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I'm ok discussing technical merits and spend time fixing issues, not so |
| 28 |
much discussing stuff I'd rather not discuss such as if I'm an evil |
| 29 |
bastard for not working with somebody that joked about my death. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
lu |
Archives