| 1 |
I read his page. It's seems to add string-overflow protections, |
| 2 |
grsecurity kernel-patch and some other things.... Look at his page |
| 3 |
(www.suxos.org) I think he will merge his technologies with gentoo. |
| 4 |
Really cool idea! |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Sebastian |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- |
| 9 |
Von: gentoo-dev-admin@g.o [mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@g.o] Im |
| 10 |
Auftrag von Jano Lukac |
| 11 |
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Januar 2002 01:33 |
| 12 |
An: gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 13 |
Betreff: Re: [gentoo-dev] Secure Gentoo - What do you think? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Joachim Blaabjerg said: |
| 16 |
> Hi people, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Recently, I asked mr. Robbins if I could use Portage in SuxOS, and we |
| 19 |
> concluded with that a collaborative effort would be for the best. I've |
| 20 |
> decided that I would really like to make a Portage "system profile" |
| 21 |
for |
| 22 |
> SuxOS, as mr. Robbins suggested, and work with the Gentoo distribution |
| 23 |
> (mainly Portage) as a base for SuxOS, effectively creating a security |
| 24 |
> centralized version of Gentoo. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
When you write about creating a secure profile, what exactly do you have |
| 27 |
in |
| 28 |
mind? e.g. package mask all insecure setups, or different pam |
| 29 |
configuration files, changing default init-scripts or preventing wrong |
| 30 |
programs from running, maybe kernel level options, etc etc. ?? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
_______________________________________________ |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 36 |
http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives