1 |
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 2017-12-21 01:35, William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
>> ~arch *will* have breakages from time to time, sometimes major |
4 |
>> breakages, until they are masked or fixed. We are not supposed to leave |
5 |
>> major breakages there, but ~arch is definitely not for the faint of |
6 |
>> heart. If you are using ~arch, you are expected to be a power user at |
7 |
>> leasst and be able to recover if your system breaks. Production servers |
8 |
>> should not be running ~arch at all. That's the whole reason ~arch |
9 |
>> exists. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> If you add something to |
12 |
> the repository which is keyworded you should at least know that it |
13 |
> builds and works in the default USE flag configuration. |
14 |
|
15 |
FWIW, this is a higher standard of quality than what is being proposed |
16 |
right now for stable keywords (roughly). Granted, stable would |
17 |
benefit from being in ~arch for 30 days, and would also benefit from |
18 |
any testing it took to get the package into ~arch. However, the |
19 |
current proposal is that there will be no runtime testing at all of |
20 |
many packages with stable dependencies. |
21 |
|
22 |
Ultimately we can define the quality standards however we want and |
23 |
users can decide what quality level they wish to run. However, the |
24 |
obvious goal would be to choose reasonable standards that are useful |
25 |
to as many as possible. |
26 |
|
27 |
Do we want more packages just dumped into ~arch and let the users |
28 |
running ~arch report runtime failures? Or do we want packages in |
29 |
~arch to be more stale? |
30 |
|
31 |
Part of me wonders if issues with stable are causing issues with |
32 |
~arch. If stable is regarded as stale that is going to push people |
33 |
into ~arch who really intend to have stable systems. That said you do |
34 |
want testing systems to have a reasonably low bug count because it is |
35 |
kind of hard to test the latest chromium beta when X11 isn't working. |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Rich |