Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: l10n.eclass
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 22:35:48
Message-Id: CAJ0EP43LBsRbRtuO3N_UQ__7C6bPdEHTyUoyFPx2+WQWeSu_OQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: l10n.eclass by Zac Medico
1 On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote:
2 > On 07/19/2012 06:14 AM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
3 >> Could be that Portage re-exports a sanitized
4 >> LINGUAS tough, but I doubt it.
5 >
6 > Portage does sanitize it if there are any linguas_* flags in IUSE,
7 > otherwise it lets the variable pass through without sanitizing it.
8
9 That's good; we definitely don't want to "sanitize" it if there are no
10 linuguas_* flags in IUSE. This would break LINUGUAS support for many
11 autotools/gettext based packages, where the autotools code parses
12 LINGUAS directly and the ebuild does nothing with it.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: l10n.eclass Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>