Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Brian Evans <grknight@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:07:58
Message-Id: 79e987ff-dbcc-0fac-3458-df39973d3630@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On 7/10/2017 2:59 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
2 > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:43:11 -0400
3 > "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote:
4 > I think portage should also warn on removing packages that came in from
5 > another. If you are removing any dependency of another package.
6 >
7 >
8
9 Portage will refuse to remove a package if it is a dependency, but you
10 have to change the invocation to be 'emerge -avc <package>'.
11
12 Then it will be very verbose if something needs said package.
13
14 Brian

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Sets vs Meta ebuilds "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>