1 |
On 9/29/13 7:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> Even then, we won't get much more than compile testing, or whatever |
3 |
> test suites the packages happen to come with. |
4 |
|
5 |
That's right. |
6 |
|
7 |
I think we can rely on the time packages spend in ~arch to catch the |
8 |
issues that wouldn't come up with compile and test phases. |
9 |
|
10 |
Also, when stable is not far behind testing, the testing that ~arch |
11 |
packages get is more applicable to stable (because there are less |
12 |
differences). This is one of the main reason for my push to stabilize |
13 |
more packages (always with proper testing), and I've also seen bugs |
14 |
being fixed in ~arch but the fixes are not always pushed to stable |
15 |
(which can be addressed by stabilizing more packages in general). |
16 |
|
17 |
Paweł |