1 |
On Tuesday 14 January 2014 22:37:19 William Hubbs wrote: |
2 |
> I think we need a global policy that either helps keep the stable tree |
3 |
> up to date or reverts an architecture to ~ over time if the arch team |
4 |
> can't keep up. |
5 |
|
6 |
As a compromise solution for minor archs, it would be nice if there were a |
7 |
portage feature allowing me to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS those packages that are |
8 |
keyworded both ~arch, and stable on some major arch. For example, on m68k, it |
9 |
would select packages that are keyworded ~m68k && amd64, or ~m68k && x86, |
10 |
etc. This would allow me to run m68k "kinda stable". |
11 |
|
12 |
[Speculation as to applying a similar system more broadly witheld.] |
13 |
|
14 |
-- Ruud |