1 |
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:36:07 +0200 |
2 |
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:14:37 +0200 |
5 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > Therefore, I ask you: how should we name the new (and simpler) patch |
8 |
> > applying function which will be provided in EAPI 6? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> My propositions: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> - apply_patches ... |
13 |
> - apply_user_patches |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Where I think we used the latter name when discussing adding user patch |
16 |
> support. |
17 |
|
18 |
blech too long, underscores. how about dopatch? |
19 |
|
20 |
if at all possible, please keep EPATCH_EXCLUDE around. it's just too damned |
21 |
useful. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gcc-porting |
26 |
toolchain, wxwidgets |
27 |
@ gentoo.org |