Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function?
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 04:46:33
Message-Id: 20130429225633.425c6656@caribou.gateway.2wire.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] How shall we name the EAPI 6 patch applying function? by "Michał Górny"
1 On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 18:36:07 +0200
2 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:14:37 +0200
5 > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 > > Therefore, I ask you: how should we name the new (and simpler) patch
8 > > applying function which will be provided in EAPI 6?
9 >
10 > My propositions:
11 >
12 > - apply_patches ...
13 > - apply_user_patches
14 >
15 > Where I think we used the latter name when discussing adding user patch
16 > support.
17
18 blech too long, underscores. how about dopatch?
19
20 if at all possible, please keep EPATCH_EXCLUDE around. it's just too damned
21 useful.
22
23
24 --
25 gcc-porting
26 toolchain, wxwidgets
27 @ gentoo.org

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature