Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile masking and profiles package.mask
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:20:47
Message-Id: 20060930141433.3e892046@snowdrop.home
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile masking and profiles package.mask by "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
1 On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:40:44 +0200 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
2 <flameeyes@g.o> wrote:
3 | On Saturday 30 September 2006 14:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 | > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149536#c4
5 |
6 | You bring up the point that you don't take any argument?
7 |
8 | The argument is still valid, nobody provided a reason for the change.
9
10 It is not a change in policy. It's a codification of existing practice.
11 Unfortunately, since most of this stuff didn't get written up years ago
12 when it happened, not everyone is aware of said practice and so a few
13 profiles from developers who weren't around at the time don't honour it.
14
15 --
16 Ciaran McCreesh
17 Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
18 Web : http://ciaranm.org/
19 as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Profile masking and profiles package.mask "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>