| 1 |
On 06/15/2013 02:34 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: |
| 2 |
> 15.06.2013 18:50, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: |
| 3 |
>> Over my dead CVS access. |
| 4 |
> Any reasonable/argumented objection? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
to put in different words: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
We do not want to use untraceable/transient/ephemeral sources for main |
| 9 |
ebuilds, live ebuilds are corner cases. Ruby related stuff had it worst |
| 10 |
regarding mis-packaging and total reliance on git with horrid stories |
| 11 |
they might tell you later over a large coffee. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> And, anyway, quoted part is optional behaviour that should just make |
| 14 |
> ebuild-writing easy. |
| 15 |
> Mandatory part is to be able to have restrict://foo.bar and downloadable |
| 16 |
> things at the same time. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
In fact the restrict part got some proposals and not a terse and stern |
| 19 |
reject. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
lu |
Archives