| 1 |
Ok, this is your last chance to do this yourself if you maintain any of |
| 2 |
these packages, and if you don't want me breaking portage so severely |
| 3 |
that it causes a catastrophic hole in the space time continuum and zaps |
| 4 |
us all to an alternate universe where the only linux distro is debian i |
| 5 |
suggest you do it |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Joshua Brindle |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Joshua Brindle wrote: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> The following packages have an selinux policy in portage (in sec-policy) |
| 12 |
> but the associated package doesn't depend on it. I'm looking for either |
| 13 |
> an "Ok, I'll do this" or "you go ahead" from each maintainer, thanks. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Apache |
| 16 |
> bind |
| 17 |
> clockspeed |
| 18 |
> daemontools |
| 19 |
> dhcp |
| 20 |
> gpm |
| 21 |
> logrotate |
| 22 |
> portmap |
| 23 |
> privoxy |
| 24 |
> publicfile |
| 25 |
> snort |
| 26 |
> ucspi-tcp |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Joshua Brindle |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> -- |
| 31 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives