| 1 |
On Friday 23 December 2005 21:45, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote: |
| 2 |
> Erm.. No, I don't think he is. We've been asking / waiting for the |
| 3 |
> [use] syntax to appear since before you joined the project. It's been on |
| 4 |
> "the list" for so long that many of us have given up... ; ) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
He - and I thought I just missed the thread between all those emails in my |
| 7 |
inbox. I'm interested as well to hear a bit about the proposed enhanced |
| 8 |
dependency syntax. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> (finally we can kill use_with !! ) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Why? There're not only autotooled configure scripts, so I don't see how to |
| 13 |
replace it in a generic way. I don't see what this would have to do with |
| 14 |
depending on ( ebuild foo without use flag bar ), either. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Carsten |
Archives