Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Benjamin Judas <benni@××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:45:49
Message-Id: 1181684566.7723.9.camel@antares.hausnetz
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML by "Stephen P. Becker"
1 Am Dienstag, den 12.06.2007, 17:23 -0400 schrieb Stephen P. Becker:
2 > On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 23:12:27 +0200
3 > Benjamin Judas <benni@××××××××××××.de> wrote:
4 >
5 > > Am Dienstag, den 12.06.2007, 21:57 +0200 schrieb Alexander Færøy:
6 > > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:54:31PM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
7 > > > > after all Paludis is useless without the portage tree.
8 > > >
9 > > > Untrue.
10 > >
11 > > Care to elaborate?
12 > >
13 > > That would also mean, that a harddisk isn't useless without any
14 > > platters.
15 >
16 > Let's see...CRAN repository support, rubygems support, not to mention
17 > the QA and search tools which may be used on any ebuild overlay or
18 > repository.
19
20 Oh, and all these repositories are not organized as a portage-tree? You
21 mean without categories and packages? Cool!
22
23 So (without a Portage tree) it replaces the oldgrown single-liner
24 wget foo; tar -xzf foo; cd foo; ./configure; make; make install
25
26 /me rings the bell
27
28 Ladies and gentlemen! We finally have a C++ written replacement for ugly
29 shell commands!

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC]: gentoo-politics ML "Stephen P. Becker" <spbecker@×××××.com>