1 |
* Kurt Lieber <klieber@g.o> [04/07/20 13:14 +0000]: |
2 |
> So, with that said, thoughts, comments and other ideas are welcome. |
3 |
|
4 |
First I have to say that it is a good choice not using |
5 |
branching or tagging in CVS. Although CVS is purposed for |
6 |
such things, it has ever been a pain maintaining another |
7 |
branch (check out the other branch, do the changes, check |
8 |
in, check out the HEAD-branch etc... -- and don't try to |
9 |
check in a file to a branch which has been edited on another |
10 |
branch...). |
11 |
|
12 |
So the proposed KEYWORD-addition is a good deal. But you |
13 |
should think about its name. 'stable' is quite bad, as we |
14 |
name our current KEYWORDS without a ~ stable. So it would |
15 |
confuse both users and devs. Another name would fit better, |
16 |
like 'enterprise:' or something like this. This also shows |
17 |
for what purpose it has been introduced. |
18 |
|
19 |
Regards, Lars |