1 |
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 16:49, Alec Berryman wrote: |
2 |
> Currently, -dev isn't a developer list; most of the e-mail is users' |
3 |
> suggestions discussed by other users and the occasional dev, as well as |
4 |
> the occasional mis-post targeted for -user. Perhaps in the future, if |
5 |
> -core would be accessible to the community that drive it, -dev could be |
6 |
> the buffer zone between the final work of the developers and the user |
7 |
> community. Right now, there's a feeling that the developers are |
8 |
> shutting themselves in an ivory tower. That's not good for community. |
9 |
> Gentoo's social contract has always said it will not "hide its |
10 |
> problems", but has continued to keep its core development decisions |
11 |
> closed. |
12 |
|
13 |
Just as a quick point of reference, I have been a gentoo developer for |
14 |
~3 months or so, maybe a bit less. You want to know how I became a |
15 |
gentoo developer? |
16 |
|
17 |
It had nothing to do with finding the keys to the fabled tower, or |
18 |
making the right friends, and had everything to do with being willing to |
19 |
give a bit of my time and energy to serve something that is needed in |
20 |
gentoo. All I did was make a couple small proposals here about some |
21 |
general stuff, and then offer to maintain the sendmail ebuild. Thats it, |
22 |
no hocus-pocus, no magic words, no secret rites, not even a special |
23 |
handshake. (Man, did I feel gypped!) |
24 |
|
25 |
My point is just this, you want access to -core, become a developer, its |
26 |
part of the territory. |
27 |
|
28 |
And I might be going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure that many |
29 |
other non-profit Linux distributions have non-open lists. In fact, I |
30 |
would be very surprised if any Linux distributions don't. |
31 |
|
32 |
--Todd |