1 |
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:28:47 +0200 |
2 |
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:27, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> |
5 |
> wrote: |
6 |
> > In all cases I want one resource to look at, viewcvs is a horrible |
7 |
> > and slow interface. So it does make sense to keep changelogs filled |
8 |
> > with information - maybe automation is needed, I don't have a |
9 |
> > strong opinion either way. But don't make me do more work because |
10 |
> > you are lazy, that never ends well. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> IMO we should just make repoman commit update the ChangeLog. |
13 |
|
14 |
What if we wanted to remove ChangeLogs then for autogeneration? Will we |
15 |
require all devs to quickly update their portage versions? |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Best regards, |
19 |
Michał Górny |