| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> To anyone (else) out there who thinks that bug wranglers should be |
| 3 |
> punished when they make mistakes in the heap of unthankful work they |
| 4 |
> perform on a more than daily basis, I would like you to know that if |
| 5 |
> you reassign bugs (back) to bug-wranglers@ without properly |
| 6 |
> communicating the reason you are doing so, I have no option but to |
| 7 |
> close the bug as CANTFIX. The reasoning is that bug-wranglers is a |
| 8 |
> waystation (or perhaps a reception desk) between users and developers - |
| 9 |
> we cannot begin to fix your bugs for you. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Sounds reasonable to me. Can't be too hard to do "Assigning back to |
| 12 |
b-w's because I don't maintain this package" or similar. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On a side note: How is the "b-w SOP doc" coming? It is obvious to me |
| 15 |
the b-w is tedious a time consuming so I would like to help every now |
| 16 |
and then but I really am not sure about the rules wrt assignment just |
| 17 |
by looking at metadata.xml. IMO, b-w'ing is something that anyone can |
| 18 |
do. |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives