1 |
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:07 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> On 01/22/2018 05:14 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sun, 2018-01-21 at 20:24 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
4 |
> > > Hi, |
5 |
> > > |
6 |
> > > In sys-app/portage-2.3.20, emerge now defaults to --dynamic- |
7 |
> > > deps=n. |
8 |
> > > This |
9 |
> > > means that unless people explicitly set |
10 |
> > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--dynamic-deps=y" they're going to have to |
11 |
> > > rebuild |
12 |
> > > packages any time that the runtime dependencies of those packages |
13 |
> > > need |
14 |
> > > to be updated. It's possible to trigger these rebuilds using the |
15 |
> > > emerge |
16 |
> > > --changed-deps=y option. |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > Some eclasses like autotools.eclass and vala.eclass generate |
19 |
> > > version/slot locked dependencies that cause the dependencies of |
20 |
> > > inheriting ebuilds to change when the versions in the eclasses |
21 |
> > > are |
22 |
> > > updated. If possible, it would be nice to avoid this version/slot |
23 |
> > > locking. If not possible, then what should be do? |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > These are mostly build time only depends, why should the user now |
26 |
> > all |
27 |
> > of a sudden care before an unrelated rebuild or upgrade, which |
28 |
> > would |
29 |
> > actually matter only then, not before? |
30 |
> |
31 |
> For various reasons, current versions of portage enable the |
32 |
> --with-bdeps=y option by default [1]. Basically, failing to update |
33 |
> installed packages and possibly leaving them with broken dependencies |
34 |
> is |
35 |
> not really a sane default behavior. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/598444 |
38 |
|
39 |
Sure, and now in combination with --with-bdeps=y and --dynamic-deps=n, |
40 |
thing are bad for these cases. I'm saying that users shouldn't have to |
41 |
care about these cases. |
42 |
|
43 |
That said, I'm not sure why the slot deps have to be there for the |
44 |
cases $vala_depend is put into DEPEND; those might just be able to be |
45 |
an unbounded dev-lang/vala. However where they are truly needed in |
46 |
RDEPEND, they will need something here, just not sure := is going to |
47 |
cut it. Maybe the interface is stable enough that anything will be fine |
48 |
with the newest version by now, but not sure. Bottom-line is, we aren't |
49 |
going to be revbumping all the vala.eclass users as a new GNOME version |
50 |
with new vala appears. The idea is to get everyone to use the new |
51 |
versions in stable ASAP, not rebuild all of them in stable first. |
52 |
In any case, this will need investigation, and it is not a good time to |
53 |
have such an investigation forced upon us with our current limited |
54 |
manpower. |