Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alex Legler <a3li@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs.gentoo.org, git.gentoo.org, *.overlays.gentoo.org migration timeline & ssh keys
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 18:50:11
Message-Id: 53F39C5B.7080708@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] cvs.gentoo.org, git.gentoo.org, *.overlays.gentoo.org migration timeline & ssh keys by "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov"
1 On 8/19/14, 8:18 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
2 > Btw, I've noticed git.overlays.gentoo.org moved to Hetzner.
3 >
4 > When I remember my expirience of work with Hetzner - I'm scary about Gentoo'
5 > infrastructure destiny.
6 >
7
8 We are directly sponsored by them with at least another machine and are
9 happy with their services.
10
11 >
12 > I had a conversation with CEO of my current DDoS-proof hoster and he expressed
13 > his desire to "help interesting projects" and asked about the necessary amount
14 > of sponsorship and it's terms (and conditions).
15 >
16 > So, can I ask you to provide some info about infra team hardware requirements
17 > (which amount needs to be sponsored) and if it is any sponsoring conditions
18 > that Gentoo Foundation can suggest to the sponsor (maybe some banner, or
19 > something like that)?
20
21 Kindly consult past messages sent to the gentoo-announce list on that topic.
22
23 >
24 > Anyway, mainly I need the amount of hardware gentoo infra team requires to
25 > [strike]get rid of hetzner[/strike] meet their "comfortable-work"
26 > requirements? Then I can discuss it with hoster again and then bring together
27 > somebody from infra-team and hoster's CEO or CTO to discuss the terms
28 > themselves.
29 >
30 >
31
32 Mind you, we are not going to 'ditch' sponsors, or randomly move
33 services around just to use your preferred hoster, even if you establish
34 sponsorship contacts with them.
35
36 Alex
37
38 PS. Your signature has a typo.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature