| 1 |
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:43:22 +0800 |
| 2 |
Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 21 April 2013 22:38, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o>wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > Denis Dupeyron schrieb: |
| 7 |
> > > I'm hoping this kind of immature and abrasive behaviours will not |
| 8 |
> > > propagate (notice the plural here). Yes, when you see a package being |
| 9 |
> > > actively maintained by somebody else you should absolutely not touch |
| 10 |
> > > it without talking to that person or team first. |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I fail to see any wrong behavior here. A bug report was created and a |
| 13 |
> > review |
| 14 |
> > of the changes was requested. The first reaction came after several weeks |
| 15 |
> > after the bug filing, and the first objection almost two months after the |
| 16 |
> > change was applied. |
| 17 |
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455074 |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> You are missing an important part of the story. |
| 21 |
> See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=455070 where we discuss |
| 22 |
> the same issue for freetype. (Yes I should have been explicit for fontconfig |
| 23 |
> too, my bad.) |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> I initially reacted within hours, saying that his proposal was in my eyes |
| 26 |
> not ready yet. I assumed I was clear enough in my refusal, but |
| 27 |
> apparently Michał didn't understand it that way. He then contacted |
| 28 |
> the herd a few weeks later, when I was on holiday, and got Luca's permission |
| 29 |
> to commit, not taking into account he hadn't touched those packages in |
| 30 |
> many years. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Just to be clear -- I misunderstood you indeed. I thought you mean that |
| 33 |
you would agree if the idea is discussed and the discussion results in |
| 34 |
a general agreement on proceeding with the solution. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> After I found out, I was a bit pissed off about it, but I was too busy with |
| 37 |
> work to deal with it (and thought it wise to cool down a bit before taking |
| 38 |
> action). I then saw bug reports about the freetype multilib ebuild revision |
| 39 |
> flooding in, and was satisfied after it got masked. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Those bugs weren't relevant to the final version of the ebuild which |
| 42 |
you have masked. The only actual bug left open was the one which I |
| 43 |
forgot to close after fixing it instantly after it was opened. |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
So please don't say that I don't take responsibility for my changes. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
Best regards, |
| 49 |
Michał Górny |
Archives