From: | Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist | ||
Date: | Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:50:39 | ||
Message-Id: | 20170606054708.1f811680@katipo2.lan | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist by Michael Orlitzky |
1 | On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 13:42:50 -0400 |
2 | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > Hans was |
5 | > attempting to fix it, but now that upstream is dead, it will remain |
6 | > insecure forever. |
7 | |
8 | IME, as long as that's clear from the pmask, and its clear what those |
9 | security vectors are, as long as an end user makes sure those vectors |
10 | can't happen, having an insecure-in-theory-but-not-in-practice |
11 | phantomjs is better than having no phantomjs. |