| 1 |
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:05:21PM +0000, Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:57:06 +0100 |
| 3 |
> Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Of course it does... Lots of people can't remove outdated broken cruft |
| 6 |
> > because $ebuild still depends on something since $arch has been |
| 7 |
> > slacking for months. Lots of people are forced to maintain outdated |
| 8 |
> > junk in this way, it's not like it's just sitting there doing nothing. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Did you even read my mail? We're not asking people to maintain old |
| 11 |
> stuff, just to leave it there as is until a newer one can be tested and |
| 12 |
> keyworded. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
No he didn't, and he probably won't. I've tried to explain this at least |
| 15 |
once in #gentoo-qa and he didn't seem to *want+ to understand it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Maybe we aren't being clear enough... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- ferdy |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Fernando J. Pereda GarcimartÃn |
| 23 |
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git) |
| 24 |
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4 |
Archives