1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 02 April 2006 14:22, Olivier CrĂȘte wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sun, 2006-02-04 at 13:08 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Sunday 02 April 2006 12:05, Jakub Moc wrote: |
5 |
>>>> This is a (not-so happy) reminder that the agony of gtk2 use flag will |
6 |
>>>> have been lasting for half a year soon. It *really* needs to die. |
7 |
>>> too bad it doesnt address packages which still legitimately utilize |
8 |
>>> gtk/gtk2 |
9 |
>> Is there a legitimate reason to use gtk1 if the gtk2 support is useable? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> nothing personal, but who are you to say whether it's legit ? |
12 |
|
13 |
Oh please... no flames :/ |
14 |
|
15 |
if a package |
16 |
> provides the interfaces and users like to use them, where's the bug ? ive |
17 |
> seen peeps from time to time who bring the hate on gtk2 because of its |
18 |
> fattiness compared to gtk1 ... they like to build packages that still can be |
19 |
> against gtk1 |
20 |
> -mike |
21 |
> |
22 |
|
23 |
Except that you won't get any support whatsoever for gtk-1 upstream, and |
24 |
except that it's been agreed upon quite some time ago that gtk vs. gtk2 |
25 |
use flags is a bad way to select between gtk-1/gtk-2/no gtk at all and |
26 |
confuses users, except that... oh well, been discussed so many times, |
27 |
not going to beat a dead horse. |
28 |
|
29 |
Please, remove the gtk2 flag from ebuilds you maintain. Thanks. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
|
33 |
jakub |