| 1 |
On 10/06/16 03:53 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
| 2 |
> ... Their repositories |
| 3 |
> would likely be amalgamations of our curated and reviewed |
| 4 |
> repositories ... |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Could you elaborate on what you mean by this? When I read it, it |
| 7 |
sounds like you're saying people will copy ebuilds/packages from the |
| 8 |
core/reviewed repositories into their own, just to have them to |
| 9 |
satisfy deps or whatever.. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If that's what you mean, then I think many of the comments mentioned |
| 12 |
earlier still apply. I forsee that we'd end up with the type of mess |
| 13 |
that binary distros (used to?) have, where the third-party repos |
| 14 |
contain various copies of potentially out-of-date and out-of-sync core |
| 15 |
packages to satisfy the unique packages they actually want to provide. |
Archives