1 |
On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 21:37 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
2 |
> So what's the point of the ChangeLog again? |
3 |
|
4 |
Isn't it to record specific changes that have happened to a specific |
5 |
package? |
6 |
|
7 |
News items may be about changes that have not yet happened - to allow |
8 |
users to plan ahead and prepare appropriately. |
9 |
|
10 |
News items may also be about (possibly future) changes where there is no |
11 |
one corresponding package; equally a news item may be relevant for a |
12 |
large number of packages. In both of those circumstances, looking for |
13 |
news in a package-specific ChangeLog doesn't seem right to me. Feels to |
14 |
me to be both bad engineering and bad SCM practice. |
15 |
|
16 |
> I'm really just against having it in emerge, especially with the current |
17 |
> suggestion of portage just doing a little bit of maintenance work for |
18 |
> external tools and nothing else. |
19 |
|
20 |
I can't think of any other place where we have every Gentoo user's |
21 |
attention to the same extent that we do when emerge outputs that |
22 |
reminder about any CONFIG_PROTECTed packages that need attention. |
23 |
|
24 |
It's the one and only place where we can reach every user. That is the |
25 |
whole purpose of this idea. We're trying to deliver the news to 100% of |
26 |
the user base, or as near as damn it. |
27 |
|
28 |
Best regards, |
29 |
Stu |
30 |
-- |
31 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
32 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
33 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
34 |
|
35 |
GnuGP key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
36 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
37 |
-- |