| 1 |
What's going on with the duplicates on this list? The below message has |
| 2 |
arrived twice, one almost 10 hours after the first. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Tom Veldhouse |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
----- Original Message ----- |
| 7 |
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net> |
| 8 |
To: <mcummings@××××××××.net>; "Greg Oliver" <greg@××××.net> |
| 9 |
Cc: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
| 10 |
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:59 PM |
| 11 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system .. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> I upgraded world an hour or so ago and it upgraded perl to 5.8. It |
| 15 |
doesn't |
| 16 |
> appear on hold to me. So far, no ill effects. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Tom Veldhouse |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> ----- Original Message ----- |
| 21 |
> From: "Michael Cummings" <mcummings@××××××××.net> |
| 22 |
> To: "Greg Oliver" <greg@××××.net> |
| 23 |
> Cc: <gentoo-dev@g.o> |
| 24 |
> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:04 PM |
| 25 |
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system .. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> > It's actually been put back on hold until we can resolve a problem with |
| 29 |
> > the libperl.so (namely that it is always called libperl.so no matter |
| 30 |
> > what version it refers to). If that is fixed appropriately - hopefully |
| 31 |
> > no remerging will be necessary. If you go with the masked build, |
| 32 |
> > emerging will be necessary, which is something we'd rather avoid. |
| 33 |
> > |
| 34 |
> > -Mike |
| 35 |
> > |
| 36 |
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 10:56:56PM -0600, Greg Oliver wrote: |
| 37 |
> > > Will it automatically rebuild all packages that are built against Perl |
| 38 |
> > > 5.6.1 libs when it emerges, or will I have to track them down with a |
| 39 |
> > > script and rebuild them manually? |
| 40 |
> > > |
| 41 |
> > > -Greg |
| 42 |
> > > |
| 43 |
> > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:35:42 -0500 |
| 44 |
> > > Michael Cummings <mcummings@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 45 |
> > > |
| 46 |
> > > > Henti, |
| 47 |
> > > > |
| 48 |
> > > > It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually |
| 49 |
> > > > hit the mirrors. |
| 50 |
> > > > |
| 51 |
> > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200 |
| 52 |
> > > > Henti Smith <bain@×××××××.za> wrote: |
| 53 |
> > > > |
| 54 |
> > > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500 |
| 55 |
> > > > > Michael Cummings <mcummings@××××××××.net> wrote: |
| 56 |
> > > > > |
| 57 |
> > > > > > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked |
| 58 |
> > > > > > on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are |
| 59 |
> > > > > > running this on a MIPS. |
| 60 |
> > > > > > |
| 61 |
> > > > > > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86. |
| 62 |
> > > > > > |
| 63 |
> > > > > > Mike - the perl maintainer |
| 64 |
> > > > > |
| 65 |
> > > > > hmmmm ... |
| 66 |
> > > > > |
| 67 |
> > > > > |
| 68 |
> > > > > I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is |
| 69 |
> > > > > not something I wanted to do .. |
| 70 |
> > > > > |
| 71 |
> > > > > Henti |
| 72 |
> > > > > |
| 73 |
> > > > > -- |
| 74 |
> > > > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 75 |
> > > > > |
| 76 |
> > > > |
| 77 |
> > > > |
| 78 |
> > > > -- |
| 79 |
> > > > |
| 80 |
> > > > -----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
| 81 |
> > > > | #gentoo-dev on irc.openprojects.net |
| 82 |
> > > > Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net |
| 83 |
> > > > Perl Guy | |
| 84 |
> > > > | GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E |
| 85 |
> > > > -----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
| 86 |
> > > > |
| 87 |
> > > > |
| 88 |
> > > > -- |
| 89 |
> > > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 90 |
> > > > |
| 91 |
> > > |
| 92 |
> > > -- |
| 93 |
> > > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 94 |
> > |
| 95 |
> > -- |
| 96 |
> > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 97 |
> > |
| 98 |
> > |
| 99 |
> |
| 100 |
> |
| 101 |
> |
| 102 |
> -- |
| 103 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 104 |
> |
| 105 |
> |
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
-- |
| 110 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives